Comments on: Conning the con man

By: Maverick

Maverick — Mon, 07 May 2007 05:50:49 +0000

Extremely well written M!
Nice way to tell the story without naming characters.
Look forward to more of this and others.
You should be a journalist…..hey… you are better…. you are a blogger. :biggrin:

Keep it up M!

0 0

By: F

Sun, 06 May 2007 16:04:21 +0000

Fascinating story – I’m sure there are a few more like him operating
entities the same way.

0 0

By: Moclippa

Moclippa — Sun, 06 May 2007 12:37:23 +0000

Mahmood, great piece, loved every bit of it! — Ditto to Tooners.

0 0

By: أبو الكلام

أبو الكلام — Sun, 06 May 2007 11:22:10 +0000

Now yours is the news with many of its roots exposed; that of Alwasat is the one with all of them still underground.

Thanks for that. I am impressed by the ability to gather this information and by the backbone you must be having to publish such vivid reporting.

While the MP’s name is (in)famous enough to need no further exposure, would you please say whether he was the recepient or issuer of the cheques? And in your mind, analysis or findings, on what legal basis was the agent (arguably an innocent one) booked? Coz he – himself – was not a party to any of the transcations involved? – i.e. the contracts/payments/etc.

I sure would:

stay tuned to the saga of conning the con man!

0 0

By: tooners

tooners — Sun, 06 May 2007 11:08:36 +0000

spicy!! can’t wait to read the 2nd chapter! :whistle:

0 0